<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DITDC: A Bluffer’s Guide to Dionne Warwick (Pt. 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://passionweiss.com/2009/10/12/ditdc-a-bluffer%e2%80%99s-guide-to-dionne-warwick-pt-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/10/12/ditdc-a-bluffer%e2%80%99s-guide-to-dionne-warwick-pt-1/</link>
	<description>Even when I was wrong, I got my point across.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:19:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OW</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/10/12/ditdc-a-bluffer%e2%80%99s-guide-to-dionne-warwick-pt-1/#comment-145103</link>
		<dc:creator>OW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 05:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionweiss.com/2009/10/12/ditdc-a-bluffer%e2%80%99s-guide-to-dionne-warwick-pt-1/#comment-145103</guid>
		<description>In Dusty&#039;s case, I don&#039;t think it was a total accident. If you listen to her Phillips UK material leading up to &quot;Dusty in Memphis,&quot;she was already working in a Northern Soul vein. She was still doing more jazzy and show tune-y stuff but like many in that era, she was playing off the shifts in soul music coming out of the U.S. and that meant  incorporating not just Motown-esque cuts but also more Southern soul tunes into her repertoire. The main difference is that &quot;Dusty in Memphis&quot;paired her with a higher caliber of musicians who just had that sound down cold.  

As for Aretha&#039;s early era - I&#039;ve been a real promoter of that, not because I think it&#039;s better than her Atlantic catalog but rather, it&#039;s just really pretty damn good in a different way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Dusty&#8217;s case, I don&#8217;t think it was a total accident. If you listen to her Phillips UK material leading up to &#8220;Dusty in Memphis,&#8221;she was already working in a Northern Soul vein. She was still doing more jazzy and show tune-y stuff but like many in that era, she was playing off the shifts in soul music coming out of the U.S. and that meant  incorporating not just Motown-esque cuts but also more Southern soul tunes into her repertoire. The main difference is that &#8220;Dusty in Memphis&#8221;paired her with a higher caliber of musicians who just had that sound down cold.  </p>
<p>As for Aretha&#8217;s early era &#8211; I&#8217;ve been a real promoter of that, not because I think it&#8217;s better than her Atlantic catalog but rather, it&#8217;s just really pretty damn good in a different way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sach</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/10/12/ditdc-a-bluffer%e2%80%99s-guide-to-dionne-warwick-pt-1/#comment-144437</link>
		<dc:creator>Sach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionweiss.com/2009/10/12/ditdc-a-bluffer%e2%80%99s-guide-to-dionne-warwick-pt-1/#comment-144437</guid>
		<description>Thanks O-Dub.

I should give that early Aretha material a shot. The variety of approaches to pop in the 60&#039;s is under-written about but I guess that&#039;s to be expected in the face of the massive musical and cultural changes brought about by deep-soul labels and rock and roll. Weird to think that Aretha would never a second shot to change directions in today&#039;s market.

And mind, sometimes putting artists in the wrong box can work out. Dusty Springfield was no Aretha but Jerry Wexler and Chips Morman wrestled out a hell of a performance out of her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks O-Dub.</p>
<p>I should give that early Aretha material a shot. The variety of approaches to pop in the 60&#8242;s is under-written about but I guess that&#8217;s to be expected in the face of the massive musical and cultural changes brought about by deep-soul labels and rock and roll. Weird to think that Aretha would never a second shot to change directions in today&#8217;s market.</p>
<p>And mind, sometimes putting artists in the wrong box can work out. Dusty Springfield was no Aretha but Jerry Wexler and Chips Morman wrestled out a hell of a performance out of her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OW</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/10/12/ditdc-a-bluffer%e2%80%99s-guide-to-dionne-warwick-pt-1/#comment-144291</link>
		<dc:creator>OW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 04:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionweiss.com/2009/10/12/ditdc-a-bluffer%e2%80%99s-guide-to-dionne-warwick-pt-1/#comment-144291</guid>
		<description>Nice post Sach. 

What&#039;s funny is that Aretha WAS preened by Columbia to be like another Dionne - she covers quite a few of Warwick&#039;s songs from that era of her career but it just wasn&#039;t working. It wasn&#039;t until Jerry Wexler at Atlantic took over her contract that someone figured out:she wasn&#039;t meant to be the next Dionne or Dinah 

Also, don&#039;t sleep on some of Warwick&#039;s &#039;70s output either, the most obvious being, &quot;Just Being Myself.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post Sach. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s funny is that Aretha WAS preened by Columbia to be like another Dionne &#8211; she covers quite a few of Warwick&#8217;s songs from that era of her career but it just wasn&#8217;t working. It wasn&#8217;t until Jerry Wexler at Atlantic took over her contract that someone figured out:she wasn&#8217;t meant to be the next Dionne or Dinah </p>
<p>Also, don&#8217;t sleep on some of Warwick&#8217;s &#8217;70s output either, the most obvious being, &#8220;Just Being Myself.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas martin</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/10/12/ditdc-a-bluffer%e2%80%99s-guide-to-dionne-warwick-pt-1/#comment-143958</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionweiss.com/2009/10/12/ditdc-a-bluffer%e2%80%99s-guide-to-dionne-warwick-pt-1/#comment-143958</guid>
		<description>what barry said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what barry said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disco Vietnam</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/10/12/ditdc-a-bluffer%e2%80%99s-guide-to-dionne-warwick-pt-1/#comment-143957</link>
		<dc:creator>Disco Vietnam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionweiss.com/2009/10/12/ditdc-a-bluffer%e2%80%99s-guide-to-dionne-warwick-pt-1/#comment-143957</guid>
		<description>I eagerly await part 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I eagerly await part 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DocZeus</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/10/12/ditdc-a-bluffer%e2%80%99s-guide-to-dionne-warwick-pt-1/#comment-143946</link>
		<dc:creator>DocZeus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionweiss.com/2009/10/12/ditdc-a-bluffer%e2%80%99s-guide-to-dionne-warwick-pt-1/#comment-143946</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t front, Sach. You would hit that in the &#039;70s, &#039;80s, 90&#039;s and today too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t front, Sach. You would hit that in the &#8217;70s, &#8217;80s, 90&#8242;s and today too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

