Michael Jackson Tribute: Kanye West’s “Good Life” by Jeff Weiss
Hi, I’m Jeff Weiss, you might remember me from such blogs as What Wombats Want and Generation Alf.
Everyone’s talking twenty years, so let’s talk two seconds. Specifically, those fleeting few plundered from “P.Y.T.,” and sampled on Kanye West’s “Good Life,” Disembodied chipmunk soul before the term was invented. Michael doing Kanye while Kanye was copping cheap white leather gloves and towing a Thriller lunchbox to grade school. That’s art really, synthesizing inspiration and re-configuring it into something entirely new, standing on the shoulders of titans, copping style pointers from Captain Eo. On another note, fuck you, Supreme Leader.
Two seconds. Here’s a list of the things that you can do in two seconds: catch and shoot, snort a bump, knock Charles Hamilton out the box. That’s not much—but somehow that was all Kanye needed from the King of Pop to create the most popular song of 2007. Do you remember how much you heard “Good Life,” that fall and winter? Shit was playing from every booming system, in every club, that catastrophic MTV Music Awards fail at the Palms. The shifty monoculture wasn’t dead after all—because Kanye had surmounted it, achieving that rare ubiquity that corny commentators eulogized years ago. And we’d taken MJ for granted so much that bloggers (myself included) were quick to offer encomiums to the pop sensibilities of Kanye and T-Pain, forgetting to thank the originator. We blew it. How can you credit the orchestra but ignore the composer?
Music is the only one of the arts uniquely equipped to process joy. Books shot with pure bliss either seem trite, silly, or the province of children. The best art can create feelings of sorrow, empathy and sheer aesthetic pleasure. Raw emotions sure, but rarely jubilation. We laugh and cry at the movies, but at their core, they’re a respite, all recumbence and sugar-rush—a passive activity to tickle the central nervous system before the slow fade out. But music is utilitarian. We sing along to it, we drive to it, we dance to it, we fuck to it. It’s everywhere, digging underneath our fingernails, knocking up against our neutrinos, a surviving atavistic remnant of some forgotten tribal past, sun and sand, songs of celebration and sadness. We sing at funerals, we dance at weddings. We don’t scrutinize “Guernica” or dissect Bergman.
Out of the hundreds of Michael manques signed and discarded within the last twenty-plus years, not one could ever match the sheer joy that naturally manifested from him. Just watch that clip of him performing “Maybe Tomorrow.” Some people are born vessels—Michael Jackson was a vessel of joy. Which is why Kanye only needed two seconds—because he understood that the only two seconds potentially more exuberant than that snippet of “P.Y.T.” probably came from “A.B.C.” or “Rock With You,” or “Beat It.”
“Good Life” was our biggest pop star paying tribute to our greatest pop star—offering a paean to the virtues of the gilded age. Kanye rapped about the cars, the jewels, the cash, the pretty young things. The difference was when Michael sang it, there was an innocence implied, before the lyrics were turned into the butt of a billion jokes, before the freakish allegations. America wasn’t innocent then—it probably never was. But it was younger, and so were we, and like any death, this is a remainder of our own frailty. A man who brought more joy to more people than nearly anyone else on earth has departed. Two seconds…but he knew how to make them last.
Download:
MP3: Michael Jackson-”P.Y.T. (Pretty Young Thing)”
MP3: Kanye West-”Good Life”
Stumble It!

July 2nd, 2009 at 6:36 am
best writing you’ve done all year
July 2nd, 2009 at 8:52 am
Great piece, but two quibbles:
1. “Good Life” wasn’t even the most popular song on the album (”Stronger” went to #1 and was the song most of my non-music geek friends went crazy for), much less the most popular song in 2007.
2. We don’t dissect Bergman at funerals, but neither do we analyze Dylan. We don’t critique anything, except in the broadest sense of critique as an expressive response. We mostly just present and perform. (But otherwise I think your argument about the utilitarianism of music is dead-on.)
July 2nd, 2009 at 9:39 am
Thanks John–I don’t know, “Good Life,” seemed to have a greater ubiquity and longevity than “Stronger” (at least in California). I don’t know if chart position really can quantify that type of thing. Ultimately, it’s pretty subjective.
I probably should’ve said “screen Bergman,” but you get the gist.
July 2nd, 2009 at 10:05 am
i co-sign barry. this is yet another reason why you’re my favorite music writer in the world.
July 2nd, 2009 at 10:54 am
Stronger was bigger on the dance floor but I’m gonna wager that Good Life is the track people will be playing at pool parties 10 years down the line.
July 2nd, 2009 at 5:20 pm
Fantastic post… There’s some debate about who’s the “new King of Pop” now, which is sort of insane to even approach seriously, but if anybody could even be allowed near the throne, I think it’d have to be Kanye.
July 3rd, 2009 at 8:53 am
JT
July 4th, 2009 at 9:56 pm
Great post, loving all the tributes, really well done and offering something that no one else really is.
I agree with the others though that ‘Stronger’ was the bigger track.
July 5th, 2009 at 4:32 am
^ truth
July 5th, 2009 at 12:22 pm
^ Which would make MJ’s successor a feckless copy-off who basically is only good at break-up songs. (The latter clause isn’t entirely true but there’s some truth to it.)
July 12th, 2009 at 7:16 pm
He’s a pretender to the throne. I never realized it until he did that performance of Love Lockdown on the VMA’s last year, but I think he went into ’singing’ so that he could get closer to being like Prince or MJ. And I really loved that performance, I thought it was one of the only great moments from the VMA’s of the last few years.
But damn, not he, nor JT, nor Chris Brown or Jay-Z or ANYONE will ever have the kind of success that MJ had. He is known the world over… hell, he’s like Mickey Mouse, you can take his picture to small corners of the world without electricity and they probably would recognize the guy on the cover of Thriller. And the thing is, as much as people say he was insecure, I think that he had a quiet confidence as a performer and was so soft-spoken in interviews and stuff, that THAT is one thing that people miss more than anything… a guy who didn’t go on television proclaiming to be the greatest (Fred Astaire calling to compliment your dancing and making the biggest selling album of all time did that for him), who used his money and power for good, and who, when his job was to entertain, he did it like nobody else ever could or would. I think some of this outpouring of love and admiration for him isn’t just because his life was cut short, it’s because the current climate, where every American Idol wananbe is eager to throw themselves into the media’s headlights, is so bereft of people like MJ at their height. We’re immediately nostalgic for the real thing, not these mediocre copycats.
So yeah, Kanye, you may have been mixing jams in your mom’s apartment or whatever, but Michael came up from more humble beginnings than either you or Hov, or most any other black artist for that matter, save the great jazz musicians and people like Ray Charles. Oh, and he started at the age of FIVE. Top that.
And don’t even get me started on Justin Timberlake. “He was a huge influence on me.” No, he was pretty much the ONLY influence on you, as all that you do is basically cribbed from the Michael Jackson playbook… but you forgot one element - GENIUS. If MJ’s death did anything, it was to make us look around at the pop music landscape and realize how all of it combined doesn’t amount to so much as a pimple on Billie Jean’s ass.
July 12th, 2009 at 11:56 pm
I agree with Jon, and - though you can’t tell - am nodding profusely. People are so groomed to accept the image-driven farce of pop music that deems raw talent unnecessary so long as sex appeal abounds. And this isn’t just a loophole, it’s basically canon with how far the industry has grabbed and run with it. Will anything change when the only ones with real gifts die off?
I also agree that the way Michael’s gentle and giving nature remained inexplicably intact through all he was dragged through is far beyond the capacity for anyone else to fathom, let alone similarly accomplish. I do, however, think he was a deeply insecure person, but on very specific levels. As a performer he was obviously completely confident and knew what he wanted without question, but the psychological damage done from childhood and likely throughout adolescence left scars on a pathological level, that left him running from everyone and no doubt running from himself whenever he wasn’t on a stage or preparing to be. King or no, he was lost, and was smart enough to know it (though it may have helped if he didn’t). And Jeff, I liked your description of his performance as natural joy manifested, since that’s what struck me about him at first sight - this unrestrained joyful spirit like a warm hug through the screen. My brain refuses to reconcile that with the sadness I saw in him, but all I know is that I felt both acutely.