<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DJ Quik &amp; Kurupt Talk Tupac and BlaQKout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://passionweiss.com/2009/06/19/dj-quik-kurupt-talk-tupac-and-blaqkout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/06/19/dj-quik-kurupt-talk-tupac-and-blaqkout/</link>
	<description>Even when I was wrong, I got my point across.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:54:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Passion of the Weiss</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/06/19/dj-quik-kurupt-talk-tupac-and-blaqkout/#comment-111077</link>
		<dc:creator>Passion of the Weiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionweiss.com/2009/06/19/dj-quik-kurupt-talk-tupac-and-blaqkout/#comment-111077</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t sat down to write a full review of the album (and probably won&#039;t), because picking out its flaws is a lot less fun than celebrating it&#039;s virtues. 

I think David&#039;s Pitchfork review was pretty accurate. An 8.2 is not a classic, and no one&#039;s calling it such. However, Quik&#039;s production finds him at the most sonically innovative he&#039;s been in a while, and Kurupt does yeoman&#039;s work at matching the oft-complex beats. Does this re-invent the wheel? Of course not, but it&#039;s a very fun West Coast summer BBQ album and that&#039;s all it&#039;s trying to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t sat down to write a full review of the album (and probably won&#8217;t), because picking out its flaws is a lot less fun than celebrating it&#8217;s virtues. </p>
<p>I think David&#8217;s Pitchfork review was pretty accurate. An 8.2 is not a classic, and no one&#8217;s calling it such. However, Quik&#8217;s production finds him at the most sonically innovative he&#8217;s been in a while, and Kurupt does yeoman&#8217;s work at matching the oft-complex beats. Does this re-invent the wheel? Of course not, but it&#8217;s a very fun West Coast summer BBQ album and that&#8217;s all it&#8217;s trying to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey Stone</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/06/19/dj-quik-kurupt-talk-tupac-and-blaqkout/#comment-110882</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionweiss.com/2009/06/19/dj-quik-kurupt-talk-tupac-and-blaqkout/#comment-110882</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s true that i don&#039;t think you can call this overrated based just on the blogb, but i agree that it isn&#039;t anything special. sometimes albums that don&#039;t get a whole lot of critical attention just aren&#039;t that good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s true that i don&#8217;t think you can call this overrated based just on the blogb, but i agree that it isn&#8217;t anything special. sometimes albums that don&#8217;t get a whole lot of critical attention just aren&#8217;t that good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/06/19/dj-quik-kurupt-talk-tupac-and-blaqkout/#comment-110443</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionweiss.com/2009/06/19/dj-quik-kurupt-talk-tupac-and-blaqkout/#comment-110443</guid>
		<description>also this is some trademark tray lack of perspective, calling a record that sold 9000 copies its first week &#039;overrated&#039; - stfu clown</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also this is some trademark tray lack of perspective, calling a record that sold 9000 copies its first week &#8216;overrated&#8217; &#8211; stfu clown</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/06/19/dj-quik-kurupt-talk-tupac-and-blaqkout/#comment-110442</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionweiss.com/2009/06/19/dj-quik-kurupt-talk-tupac-and-blaqkout/#comment-110442</guid>
		<description>per usual tray sounds nuts here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>per usual tray sounds nuts here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tray</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/06/19/dj-quik-kurupt-talk-tupac-and-blaqkout/#comment-110114</link>
		<dc:creator>Tray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 22:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionweiss.com/2009/06/19/dj-quik-kurupt-talk-tupac-and-blaqkout/#comment-110114</guid>
		<description>This album&#039;s a bit overrated. There are 13 tracks. One&#039;s a skit, one&#039;s a bad musical interlude, one&#039;s an alternate version. That leaves 10 songs. Out of those, some are just okay, some are awful, and even many of the good ones suffer from incredibly antiquated hooks.  I count four songs I really like (Ohh, Jupiter, the two singles), four that are okay but that I&#039;ll probably never listen to again, and two noxious stinkers (Cream N Ya Panties, Watcha Wanna Do).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This album&#8217;s a bit overrated. There are 13 tracks. One&#8217;s a skit, one&#8217;s a bad musical interlude, one&#8217;s an alternate version. That leaves 10 songs. Out of those, some are just okay, some are awful, and even many of the good ones suffer from incredibly antiquated hooks.  I count four songs I really like (Ohh, Jupiter, the two singles), four that are okay but that I&#8217;ll probably never listen to again, and two noxious stinkers (Cream N Ya Panties, Watcha Wanna Do).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

