<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DJ Quik &#038; Kurupt Talk Tupac and BlaQKout</title>
	<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/06/19/dj-quik-kurupt-talk-tupac-and-blaqkout/</link>
	<description>Because I'm naughty by nature, not cause I hate 'cha</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Passion of the Weiss</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/06/19/dj-quik-kurupt-talk-tupac-and-blaqkout/#comment-111077</link>
		<author>Passion of the Weiss</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://passionweiss.com/2009/06/19/dj-quik-kurupt-talk-tupac-and-blaqkout/#comment-111077</guid>
		<description>I haven't sat down to write a full review of the album (and probably won't), because picking out its flaws is a lot less fun than celebrating it's virtues. 

I think David's Pitchfork review was pretty accurate. An 8.2 is not a classic, and no one's calling it such. However, Quik's production finds him at the most sonically innovative he's been in a while, and Kurupt does yeoman's work at matching the oft-complex beats. Does this re-invent the wheel? Of course not, but it's a very fun West Coast summer BBQ album and that's all it's trying to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t sat down to write a full review of the album (and probably won&#8217;t), because picking out its flaws is a lot less fun than celebrating it&#8217;s virtues. </p>
<p>I think David&#8217;s Pitchfork review was pretty accurate. An 8.2 is not a classic, and no one&#8217;s calling it such. However, Quik&#8217;s production finds him at the most sonically innovative he&#8217;s been in a while, and Kurupt does yeoman&#8217;s work at matching the oft-complex beats. Does this re-invent the wheel? Of course not, but it&#8217;s a very fun West Coast summer BBQ album and that&#8217;s all it&#8217;s trying to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey Stone</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/06/19/dj-quik-kurupt-talk-tupac-and-blaqkout/#comment-110882</link>
		<author>Trey Stone</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://passionweiss.com/2009/06/19/dj-quik-kurupt-talk-tupac-and-blaqkout/#comment-110882</guid>
		<description>it's true that i don't think you can call this overrated based just on the blogb, but i agree that it isn't anything special. sometimes albums that don't get a whole lot of critical attention just aren't that good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s true that i don&#8217;t think you can call this overrated based just on the blogb, but i agree that it isn&#8217;t anything special. sometimes albums that don&#8217;t get a whole lot of critical attention just aren&#8217;t that good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/06/19/dj-quik-kurupt-talk-tupac-and-blaqkout/#comment-110443</link>
		<author>David</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://passionweiss.com/2009/06/19/dj-quik-kurupt-talk-tupac-and-blaqkout/#comment-110443</guid>
		<description>also this is some trademark tray lack of perspective, calling a record that sold 9000 copies its first week 'overrated' - stfu clown</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also this is some trademark tray lack of perspective, calling a record that sold 9000 copies its first week &#8216;overrated&#8217; - stfu clown</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/06/19/dj-quik-kurupt-talk-tupac-and-blaqkout/#comment-110442</link>
		<author>David</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://passionweiss.com/2009/06/19/dj-quik-kurupt-talk-tupac-and-blaqkout/#comment-110442</guid>
		<description>per usual tray sounds nuts here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>per usual tray sounds nuts here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tray</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/06/19/dj-quik-kurupt-talk-tupac-and-blaqkout/#comment-110114</link>
		<author>Tray</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 22:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://passionweiss.com/2009/06/19/dj-quik-kurupt-talk-tupac-and-blaqkout/#comment-110114</guid>
		<description>This album's a bit overrated. There are 13 tracks. One's a skit, one's a bad musical interlude, one's an alternate version. That leaves 10 songs. Out of those, some are just okay, some are awful, and even many of the good ones suffer from incredibly antiquated hooks.  I count four songs I really like (Ohh, Jupiter, the two singles), four that are okay but that I'll probably never listen to again, and two noxious stinkers (Cream N Ya Panties, Watcha Wanna Do).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This album&#8217;s a bit overrated. There are 13 tracks. One&#8217;s a skit, one&#8217;s a bad musical interlude, one&#8217;s an alternate version. That leaves 10 songs. Out of those, some are just okay, some are awful, and even many of the good ones suffer from incredibly antiquated hooks.  I count four songs I really like (Ohh, Jupiter, the two singles), four that are okay but that I&#8217;ll probably never listen to again, and two noxious stinkers (Cream N Ya Panties, Watcha Wanna Do).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
