<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LA Times: Company Flow-&#8221;Funcrusher Plus&#8221; Reissue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://passionweiss.com/2009/05/08/la-times-company-flow-funcrusher-plus-reissue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/05/08/la-times-company-flow-funcrusher-plus-reissue/</link>
	<description>Even when I was wrong, I got my point across.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:58:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CommishCH</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/05/08/la-times-company-flow-funcrusher-plus-reissue/#comment-100912</link>
		<dc:creator>CommishCH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionweiss.com/2009/05/08/la-times-company-flow-funcrusher-plus-reissue/#comment-100912</guid>
		<description>Excellent write up brah.  Hoping some of the masses pick this joint up and keep on Summer rotation.  A CF reunion tour maybe too?  Hmmmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent write up brah.  Hoping some of the masses pick this joint up and keep on Summer rotation.  A CF reunion tour maybe too?  Hmmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.ViLL</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/05/08/la-times-company-flow-funcrusher-plus-reissue/#comment-100543</link>
		<dc:creator>J.ViLL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 05:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionweiss.com/2009/05/08/la-times-company-flow-funcrusher-plus-reissue/#comment-100543</guid>
		<description>Check this out and tell me what you think!!
NEW ARTIST!!! J VILL - LEGOS [CDQ/DIRTY/NODJ] BANGER!!!
http://www.zshare.net/audio/59853318da2b1a8e/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check this out and tell me what you think!!<br />
NEW ARTIST!!! J VILL &#8211; LEGOS [CDQ/DIRTY/NODJ] BANGER!!!<br />
<a href="http://www.zshare.net/audio/59853318da2b1a8e/" rel="nofollow">http://www.zshare.net/audio/59853318da2b1a8e/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Passion of the Weiss</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/05/08/la-times-company-flow-funcrusher-plus-reissue/#comment-100527</link>
		<dc:creator>Passion of the Weiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 02:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionweiss.com/2009/05/08/la-times-company-flow-funcrusher-plus-reissue/#comment-100527</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t see &quot;WTF&quot; as that type of record-yes, it certainly has anti-commercial sentiment, but it also has &quot;Dogshit,&quot; and &quot;Black Shampoo.&quot; Whereas, with those three records, it&#039;s the central theme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t see &#8220;WTF&#8221; as that type of record-yes, it certainly has anti-commercial sentiment, but it also has &#8220;Dogshit,&#8221; and &#8220;Black Shampoo.&#8221; Whereas, with those three records, it&#8217;s the central theme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quan</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/05/08/la-times-company-flow-funcrusher-plus-reissue/#comment-100524</link>
		<dc:creator>quan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 01:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionweiss.com/2009/05/08/la-times-company-flow-funcrusher-plus-reissue/#comment-100524</guid>
		<description>don&#039;t you think wu-tang&#039;s &quot;forever&quot; belongs in that anti-commercial triptych? seems like it&#039;s even more important than any of those three if only for how many more people probably heard it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#8217;t you think wu-tang&#8217;s &#8220;forever&#8221; belongs in that anti-commercial triptych? seems like it&#8217;s even more important than any of those three if only for how many more people probably heard it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrfjelstad</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/05/08/la-times-company-flow-funcrusher-plus-reissue/#comment-99530</link>
		<dc:creator>jrfjelstad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 00:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionweiss.com/2009/05/08/la-times-company-flow-funcrusher-plus-reissue/#comment-99530</guid>
		<description>excellent write-up. did you read that interview with them on pitchfork?  el is funny fucking guy.    

also, a 33 1/3 for Supreme Clientele is massively important</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellent write-up. did you read that interview with them on pitchfork?  el is funny fucking guy.    </p>
<p>also, a 33 1/3 for Supreme Clientele is massively important</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2009/05/08/la-times-company-flow-funcrusher-plus-reissue/#comment-99503</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 21:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionweiss.com/2009/05/08/la-times-company-flow-funcrusher-plus-reissue/#comment-99503</guid>
		<description>This is perfect timing. I&#039;ve been re-visiting Company Flow this past week to remind myself what hip-hop used to sound like. Really great writing on this man, you sum up their influence nicely. I like the Asher Roth tie in too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is perfect timing. I&#8217;ve been re-visiting Company Flow this past week to remind myself what hip-hop used to sound like. Really great writing on this man, you sum up their influence nicely. I like the Asher Roth tie in too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

