<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunset Rubdown: Random Spirit Lover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://passionweiss.com/2007/10/16/sunset-rubdown-random-spirit-lover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://passionweiss.com/2007/10/16/sunset-rubdown-random-spirit-lover/</link>
	<description>Even when I was wrong, I got my point across.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:58:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: christian</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2007/10/16/sunset-rubdown-random-spirit-lover/#comment-4151</link>
		<dc:creator>christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionweiss.com/2007/10/16/sunset-rubdown-random-spirit-lover/#comment-4151</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a good review but I don&#039;t think it does the album much justice. You obviously love the record, as do most people who come in contact with it, but the problem is that you don&#039;t say much about the album itself. All you seem to say is that it&#039;s not too different from &quot;Shut Up I Am Dreaming...&quot; and &quot;Apologies to the Queen Mary,&quot; but I find it to be drastically different in many, many ways. It&#039;s nice when reviewers inject their relationship with a record into their work, but if that&#039;s all there is, it leaves the reader with confusion and any questions unanswered. This seems to be a big problem with reviews (for example, ANY pitchfork review). I think the point IS how it sounds. There are countless layers, instruments, synthesizers, vocal tracks, segues, key-changes, repeated themes, revisited lyrics, styles, approaches, and surprises. That is the magic of the album.  Krug combines so many elements to create a thick and beautifully dense work of art that forces the listener to participate and react.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a good review but I don&#8217;t think it does the album much justice. You obviously love the record, as do most people who come in contact with it, but the problem is that you don&#8217;t say much about the album itself. All you seem to say is that it&#8217;s not too different from &#8220;Shut Up I Am Dreaming&#8230;&#8221; and &#8220;Apologies to the Queen Mary,&#8221; but I find it to be drastically different in many, many ways. It&#8217;s nice when reviewers inject their relationship with a record into their work, but if that&#8217;s all there is, it leaves the reader with confusion and any questions unanswered. This seems to be a big problem with reviews (for example, ANY pitchfork review). I think the point IS how it sounds. There are countless layers, instruments, synthesizers, vocal tracks, segues, key-changes, repeated themes, revisited lyrics, styles, approaches, and surprises. That is the magic of the album.  Krug combines so many elements to create a thick and beautifully dense work of art that forces the listener to participate and react.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://passionweiss.com/2007/10/16/sunset-rubdown-random-spirit-lover/#comment-4136</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionweiss.com/2007/10/16/sunset-rubdown-random-spirit-lover/#comment-4136</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the former. Great review. I loved this line in particular. &quot;Krug is the rare songwriter capable of writing songs that can mean 1,000 things to a 1,000 people, an opacity that lends itself to a sort of timelessness that allows you to believe that if you play this in 50 years it’ll retain the same sort of mystery and magic that it holds today.&quot; This album is def my AOTY and gets better with every listen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the former. Great review. I loved this line in particular. &#8220;Krug is the rare songwriter capable of writing songs that can mean 1,000 things to a 1,000 people, an opacity that lends itself to a sort of timelessness that allows you to believe that if you play this in 50 years it’ll retain the same sort of mystery and magic that it holds today.&#8221; This album is def my AOTY and gets better with every listen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

